(Originally published in Inside Higher Ed on July 14, 2025)

I am not currently on a 12-step program of any kind, but recently I felt the need to seek forgiveness for a transgression committed 50 years ago.  This summer is the 50th anniversary of the release of Jaws, the movie that redefined the definition of blockbuster and made a whole generation think twice before stepping into the ocean for a quick dip.


I took my little sister to see Jaws that summer, having already seen it.  As big brothers do, I waited until the exact moment when the shark leaps out of the water while Roy Scheider is casually ladling chum into the ocean behind the boat, and either grabbed or pinched her.  All to make the movie-watching experience more realistic, of course.


A recent article in The Washington Post explored why, despite three sequels, Jaws never became a money-making franchise in the way that Star Wars or the Marvel movies have.  The obvious reason is that Steven Spielberg elected not to be involved after the original movie. Thus, while I find myself humming John Williams’ simple but ominous theme music every time I read the latest news, the only thing I remember from any of the other three movies is the tagline for Jaws 2, “Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water.”


I thought about that tagline from a college admission perspective last week when I learned that Cornell College (the one in Iowa, not the Ivy) has launched what is either an innovative financial aid initiative or a gimmick. 


As detailed by several other publications, Cornell College emailed 16,000 soon-to-be high school seniors in its inquiry pool.  Nothing unusual about that.  What was different about this email was that it included a link to a personalized estimated financial aid package.  Sending out financial aid offers/estimates to students who haven’t applied for financial aid or admission is the new twist in what Cornell calls its “Save Your Seat” initiative.


If you are wondering how Cornell was able to send an estimated aid package to students who haven’t completed a FAFSA, the college started by mining ZIP code data for its inquiry pool.  The nine-digit ZIP+4 code in student addresses provides precise information about where they live and allows Cornell to guesstimate a family’s economic circumstances.   It might therefore be more accurate to say that the estimated financial aid package is individualized rather than personalized, because there is an element of geographic or ZIP code profiling taking place. The ZIP+4 information is supplemented by aggregated data provided by College Raptor, the consulting firm engaged by Cornell, along with historical internal data on financial aid packages.


There are some kinks to work out and questions to be considered, of course.  How will Cornell factor in Pell Grants and other governmental financial aid? Will the college make up the difference if the student’s SAI (Student Aid Index) turns out to be higher than Cornell’s estimate?  Apparently Cornell did some testing using applicants from last year and found that the estimates were reliable in the vast majority of cases.


The Save Your Seat financial aid package for every student includes a $33,000 National Academic Scholarship covering nearly half of Cornell’s list price.  To guarantee access to the aid, Cornell is asking students to apply by the end of this month and submit an enrollment deposit by September 1. As The Chronicle of Higher Education explains, “students who apply by the end of July and submit a deposit by September 1 are guaranteed to receive the $33,000 scholarship, plus any institutional need-based grants for which they might qualify, based on their estimate. They will also get first dibs on housing and first-year seminars. (Those who deposit by November 8 will get the same deal, minus the guaranteed need-based grants and priority registration for the seminars.)”


So what should we make of Save Your Seat? Is Cornell College on to something, or is this another marketing gimmick intended to differentiate Cornell from the mass of small, liberal arts colleges? (Its one-course-at-a-time curriculum already distinguishes it.) 


I applaud Cornell for trying to introduce some transparency about cost up front.  We know that affordability is both a major concern and a major impediment for many families in considering colleges, and particularly private colleges.  Having a way to estimate cost early in the college search rather than at the very end is potentially a huge step forward for college admission.  Cornell’s initiative might be thought of as an updated version of the Net Price Calculator, with someone else doing the calculations for you.  Save Your Seat might also be seen as the next iteration in the direct admission movement.


But let us stop for a moment to acknowledge that Cornell’s new initiative, while more transparent, isn’t truly transparent.  It does nothing to illuminate the high-cost, high-discount model that higher education relies on.


There are good reasons for that.  There have been several colleges that have tried to lead a movement to reset tuition, substantially reducing their sticker price but also substantially reducing discounts. They learned two things.  The first was that they were willing to lead,  but other colleges were not willing to follow.  


The bigger issue is that they learned that families are more than happy to pay lower tuition, but are not happy to lose their “merit” scholarships.  As it turns out, merit scholarships are among the least transparent and most misunderstood contrivances in college admission, perhaps deliberately so.


Just last week I spoke with someone who was surprised that a nephew had been admitted to college and then shocked when he received a merit scholarship.  That conversation brought to mind a phone call I had with the mother of one of my students years ago.  The son was a good kid but not a strong student, and he had just received merit scholarships to two different colleges.  I finally figured out that the point of her call was to ask what was wrong with the two colleges that were awarding her son merit scholarships.


The $33,000 National Academic Scholarships offered to every Save Your Seat email recipient might be thought of as the higher education equivalent of Oprah’s “You get a merit scholarship! You get a merit scholarship!” Cornell is far from alone in giving a discount to most or all students, but the potential pickle in which it finds itself is a situation where it tells students they are not admitted after already telling them they have won a merit scholarship.


That is far from the biggest ethical issue raised by the new plan. If the move toward greater financial aid transparency, at least in theory, is a positive step, asking students to apply by the end of July and deposit by September is anything but.


When the National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC) was forced to abandon key aspects of its code of ethics as part of a consent decree with the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, there were fears that college admission might deteriorate into a lawless “Wild West,” with colleges coming up with new strategies and incentives to coerce vulnerable students into decisions they weren’t ready to make.  Thankfully that hasn’t happened to the degree predicted.


Cornell’s decision to tie the Save Your Seat financial offers to an earlier application and enrollment deadline represents another leap forward in the acceleration of the college admission process. Who thinks that’s a good idea for students?  It ignores the fact that many high school counseling offices are closed during the summer and won’t be able to send transcripts (perhaps Cornell will use self-reported grades).  It is also significantly earlier than the provision in the now-defunct NACAC Statement of Principles of Good Practice prohibiting an application deadline before October 15.  Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water.


It’s not clear to me why the earlier deadlines are necessary for the program to work.  It’s clear that there are benefits for Cornell, but students should be allowed to choose where to go to college thoughtfully and freely, without coercion or manipulation.  Whose seat is being saved here?